Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney" Results 341 - 360 of 445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The handbook was prepared by the Office of Chief Counsel for the Criminal Tax Division and obtained through the Freedom of Information Act....The IRS continued to take the same position, the documents indicate, even after a federal appeals court ruled in the 2010 case U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Sweeney, No. 10-0461/NA, was argued on 17 May. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 9:22 pm
The bill improves upon the notice provisions to property owners citing Harrison v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
  Special thanks to loyal reader Bill Sweeney for providing me with copies of the two coverage complaints. [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:31 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: After long wait, 14 accident victims get promised money, April 28, 2015, By Dan Sweeney, Sun-Sentinel More Blog Entries: Carlson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm by Ilyse Schuman
Hunter next discussed the Board’s recent invitation for input on whether university faculty members are employees covered under the NLRA or are managerial employees excluded from coverage, as was established by the case NLRB v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
Attorney for Campos: Kathleen Sweeney, Indianapolis, IN. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:58 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Marguerite Sweeney, Former Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board In the recent en banc decision Nunes v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm by Ilya Somin
Love Field.The Supreme Court is now considering whether it wants to review Love Terminal Partners v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
Kimberly McCauley is a California anti-vaccination activist, who has been in the news expressing her views. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by Howard Ullman
Sweeney, 53 F.3d 825 (7th Cir. 1995) (at least suggesting that a settlement agreement imposing restrictions within the zone that might be imposed by future litigation would not be per se unlawful); Clorox Co. v. [read post]