Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney"
Results 361 - 380
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
The following day Mr Mehari sought legal advice, and, following a letter, an application was made on the evening of 17 September to the duty judge (Sweeney J). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:25 am
The following day Mr Mehari sought legal advice, and, following a letter, an application was made on the evening of 17 September to the duty judge (Sweeney J). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:31 am
We see the outcome in Empire Purveyors, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:17 pm
(1)Novartis Pharmaceuticals Uk Ltd (2) Andrew Roy Grantham v (1) Stop Huntingdon Aminal Cruelty (SHAC) by its representative Max Gastone (2) Greg Avery (3) Natasha Avery (4) Heather James [2009] EWHC 2716 (QBD) Sweeney J 30 October 2009 An injunction against animal rights protesters could not be altered to increase the restriction on their protest without a disproportionate interference with the protesters’ rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm
The Ninth Circuit in Dukes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
Sweeney Miller, a firm on Watermill’s panel, were instructed: “Some time around the end of October 2006 Watermill sent Sweeney Miller an e-mail introducing Miss Scrowther and giving brief details of the transaction. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:12 am
Sweeney, J.P., Buckley, DeGrasse, Freedman, ... [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:44 am
Sweeney. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 1:40 pm
Newton's execution on May 24, 2007, took nearly two hours with efforts to find IV sites.Coverage of the Baze v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
In LaMasa v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
Source: LexisNexis, August 6, 2009. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run July 19, 2009. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:09 am
Special thanks to loyal reader Bill Sweeney for providing me with copies of the two coverage complaints. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
The Washington Supreme Court issued a decision today in Morgan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
The Washington Supreme Court issued a decision today in Morgan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:10 am
However, Labor Law subdivisions 10 (professional educators) and 11 (non-professional educators) of §590.11 provide that such persons who are given a reasonable assurance of reemployment for the following school semester are ineligible for benefits if they are unemployed between successive semesters.For example, in Huff v Sweeney, Appellate Division, 222 A.D.2d 919, the Appellate Division ruled that teacher's aides who are provided with a reasonable assurance of… [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
