Search for: "Sweeney v. Sweeney"
Results 121 - 140
of 441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Mills v Sweeney, 219 NY 213, decided in 1916, the Appellate Division explained that any local law that "[a]bolishes an elective office" or "reduces the salary of an elective officer during his [or her] term of office" is subject to the approval of a mandatory referendum. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:18 am
Sweeney of the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:48 pm
Here is the opinion. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 6:49 am
Sweeney (Civil Rights Act) Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
Sweeney (Civil Rights Act) Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
Sweeney (Civil Rights Act) Comanche Nation of Oklahoma v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:23 am
Broadcast-v-Dman-Complaint [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm
Love Field.The Supreme Court is now considering whether it wants to review Love Terminal Partners v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:03 pm
Here is the order. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
Sweeney, Crossing the Himalayas: Exculpatory Clauses in Global Transport. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:49 am
Sweeney was not a person authorized under O.R.C. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Sweeney (Indian Child Welfare Act) Petitions were denied in:Wilson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm
Sweeney (Indian Child Welfare Act) Petitions were denied in:Wilson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:16 pm
Sweeney (Indian Child Welfare Act) Petitions were denied in:Wilson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:23 am
This is otherwise known as the Goldwater litigation, the second federal case filed back in 2015 in Arizona. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:15 am
Sweeney (E.D. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:25 am
The March 20, 2019, South Carolina Supreme Court opinion in Sweeney v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
Proppant Express Investments LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In Action No. 2, the law firm of Shanley, Sweeney, Reilly & Allen, P.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Sweeney was not a person authorized under O.R.C. [read post]