Search for: "Sweeney v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 10:58 am by Matt Brown
He got that from the part in Sweeney discussing State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 6:25 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Defendants sought to remove the case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am by Dwight Sullivan
Here are the granted issues in Sweeney: WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 1:06 am
We recently reported (see our earlier blog article) the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in BLR Group of America, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, an important takings case decided by the Federal Circuit last year. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF also granted review in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:59 am by Dwight Sullivan
On Wednesday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]