Search for: "Sweeny v. Sweeny" Results 1 - 20 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
Chancery Addresses Forum Non Conveniens Delaware law has evolved regarding the nuances of forum non conveniens, and those most recent iterations are explained in the Chancery decision styled Sweeny v. [read post]
” Tim Sweeney’s Push and KCC’s Remaining Tasks  Tim Sweeny gave a speech in South Korea on November, 15, 2021, saying “Apple is ignoring laws passed by Korea’s democracy. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
For the most recent iteration of Delaware law on the topic of forum non conveniens, as it has evolved over the last few years, careful readers should be aware of the recent Chancery decision in Sweeny v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Knopf v Esposito  2019 NY Slip Op 33468(U) November 27, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150315/2019 Judge: Gerald Lebovits. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The test is whether she was "similarly situated in all material respects to individuals with whom she seeks to compare herself," as per Graham v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
L.J. 103 (2013-2014), JoAnne Sweeny, University of Louisville The Constitutional Limits of Private Surveillance, Kansas Law Review, Forthcoming, Kiel Robert Brennan-Marquez, Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, Judge Sweeny dissenting,* reversed the Supreme Court’s determination “on the law” and remanded the matter to the Fund for a “new determination” consistent with the majority’s decision.Gakhal’s injury occurred on the first day of her learning to ride a motor scooter as part of her normal police training. [read post]