Search for: "Sweet v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
Let's start with a relatively simple example from an opinion by Judge Sweet of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 8:55 am
This article concludes by addressing an intractable dilemma: in developing GPLs as a means of enhancing the effectiveness of international legal systems, judges reveal gaps between state consent and control, potentially undermining their own support. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:55 pm
He argues that the consecutive sentences: violate his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments as explained in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The price tag might not be great, given the state of the market, product overlap and consolidation, title renewal costs and the lack of viable competitive bidding, but the outcome, if it happened, could be impressive. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
Accredited journalists in attendance at financial remedy hearings held in private are collaterally bound by that undertaking: Appleton v Gallagher, above, at [10]. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 4:31 pm
With Steyn J stating that the appeal has a “real prospect of success”, it appears that Cadwalladr is not out of the woods yet. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 12:02 pm
The respondent in Huscoal, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am
The New York Times thought Chile’s effort to be pretty darn sweet. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 8:51 am
State Coll. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
This is Sweet and All, Jeff, But What Does this Baseball Road Trip Have to do with the FMLA? [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
While that is pretty sweet, I will pay for it next year when I teach Internet Law in both Spring and Fall 2023. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:00 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinions: State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:03 am
In 2020, the appeals court reaffirmed this double standard in Lopez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 2:21 am
See AdvaMed Welcomes Senate Committee Passage of MDUFA V Legislation (June 15, 2022). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:56 pm
As some of you may have heard or read, a preliminary settlement in the case of Sweet v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Twitter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Sweet v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:21 am
[Sweet for the defendant, that is.] [read post]
