Search for: "Sweet v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
He quitclaimed his interest in the Sweet Briar property to the taxpayer. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 10:22 am
Thanks to co-blogger Bob V, we learn about this enterprising family:"A father and son from California have pleaded guilty for their roles in a scheme that defrauded more than $27 million from Affordable Care Act programs in at least 12 states ... [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:33 am by FDABlog HPM
Margaret Hamburg states in a preface to the report, “performance in many traditionally strong PDUFA goal areas decreased in FY 2008; and, therefore, this report presents a picture of mixed success.”  [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/AoBszeibPT -> LinkedIn’s “Reference Search” Service Doesn’t Violate Fair Credit Reporting Act–Sweet v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
The June 2007 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Trade Mark Reports - published ahead of its cover date as usual - carries a fascinating selection of cases. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 am by SHG
sweet start to the statement of facts in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 8:21 am
A podcast roundup of stories from the world of family law and family law blogs:The Week in View 17th January 2009Stories/posts referred to in the podcast:Bird v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: Common senseThe Domino Effect of The Current Economic Crisis (Georgia Family Law Blog)Crunch traps split divorcees under one roof - Sunday TimesBenussi Blog: Home (not so) sweet home - how to live apart under the same roofChildren services inquiry ordered - BBC NewsBaby P:… [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
’Following a short and sweet [for Rolex and, by implication, IP rights owners of all shapes and sizes] analysis consisting of just 13 paragraphs, the CJEU ruled as follows:Council Regulation ... 1383/2003 ... [read post]