Search for: "Sweet v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 987
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 2:34 am
KING v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Regardless, I have a few simple tips to help diffuse the saltiness and infuse the sweetness. 1. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
” Babbitt v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:58 pm
” Babbitt v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:31 am
Maintaining its recent record of coming out ahead of its cover date, the July 2007 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's monthly IP flagship journal, the European Intellectual Property Review, still edited by its originator Hugh Brett, has some highly timely and topical content. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Bryan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
State, 371 A.2d 699 (Md. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:18 am
Recently, the issue raised in Sweet v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:36 am
This change from the old ‘fair basis’ provision was intended to align Australian patent law with that of the UK and Europe, requiring the disclosure to be commensurate with the scope of the claims, i.e. that the description should be sufficient to enable the skilled person to perform the invention across the full width of the claims.So far, there has been no judicial consideration of this new enablement requirement, and until recently there was just one Patent Office decision, CSR… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Madison (1803), Ex parte McCardle (1869), and City of Boerne v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
The majority opinion is short and sweet. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:46 am
See also Sweet v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 2:58 am
The “Black Book”, as it is widely known, is a comprehensive commentary to the Patents Act and the last edition not only provides updates but also includes substantial revisions of key parts that have been affected by the recent case-law, such as Eli Lily v Actavis, Generics (UK) v Warner-Lambert, Actavis v ICOS and Shanks v Unilever. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
” The FDA opinion letter stated that the refiners failed to “provide sufficient grounds for the agency to authorize ‘corn sugar’ as an alternate common or usual name for HFCS. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 5:29 pm
This is the first part of a paper delivered at the JUSTICE/Sweet and Maxwell Human Rights conference on 20 October 2010. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:49 am
", Sweet, Brenda -56 Cleveland State Law Review 709 [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 2:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 3:39 am
Yung v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
