Search for: "Swift & Company v. Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
Swift relied on Specht v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 2:03 am
What does that mean? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:13 pm
Lyondell Chemical Company. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:15 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:37 pm
(including some JOHN DOEs)—seems, even at the most preliminary stage, like a good candidate for swift summary judgment. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:55 am
In a separate ruling, it granted the defendants’ motion to stay a decision on conditional class certification pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of its earlier ruling denying a motion to compel arbitration (Doe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:10 am
Swift Distribution, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
—William Shakespeare 1Cole v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am
The company/employer could be held liable for failure to protect you from harassment perpetrated by non-employees, so long as there is evidence they knew or should have known about it and failed to take swift and reasonable steps to stop it. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:51 am
Swift Transp. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
SEC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:47 pm
Factual Background The EEOC filed two lawsuits alleging that JBS USA, LLC, which does business as meat packing company JBS Swift & Company, discriminated against a class of Somali Muslim employees at its facilities in Greeley, Colorado and Grand Island, Nebraska. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 4:51 am
” Garza v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:48 am
See, e.g., the uncited Swift v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:36 pm
Last year, in Riegel v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:36 am
Facebook Signs Deals With Media Companies, Celebrities for Facebook Live — One does not live on user-generated content alone. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
Merpel adds, does anyone have the original transcipt or, better still, an English translation? [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Lengthy judgement on authorship in computer programs Andrews v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 2:58 pm
The fact that some employees may have been rattled by the swift, no-nonsense entry of fifty agents does not justify the suppression of evidence. [read post]
