Search for: "Sword v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Should they be used as swords or shields? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:05 am
Our stated preference for clients is LTCI, if available. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:13 am
The decision earlier this month in Cyprus Amax Minerals v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See McDonald v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:39 pm
In Philip v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:45 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
Sandig v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
In recent split decision by the Superior Court in the case of Gregury v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
A compelling point is raised by Justice Khampepe when she reminds us that South Africa is a non-examination state, i.e. the state does not check whether an invention is novel before it is registered as a patent. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
A compelling point is raised by Justice Khampepe when she reminds us that South Africa is a non-examination state, i.e. the state does not check whether an invention is novel before it is registered as a patent. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
A compelling point is raised by Justice Khampepe when she reminds us that South Africa is a non-examination state, i.e. the state does not check whether an invention is novel before it is registered as a patent. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:19 am
A compelling point is raised by Justice Khampepe when she reminds us that South Africa is a non-examination state, i.e. the state does not check whether an invention is novel before it is registered as a patent. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 7:12 am
I have previously noted that standing is a double-edged sword. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 1:33 pm
As a result, in the 1982 case Edgar v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:17 am
“Lawyers can safely act on the facts stated by their clients. [read post]
