Search for: "T. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 2,916
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 10:03 pm
Here is the abstract: This Article considers the future of originalism in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 1:03 pm by Derek T. Muller
I’ve previously discussed the District of Columbia statehood bill, H.R. 51, and how, I think, D.C. statehood (or retrocession of D.C. to Maryland) should be contingent on a repeal of the Twenty-Third Amendment. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:57 pm by Jim Chen
Supp. 2d 308 (D.D.C. 2011), the United States District Court for the District of Columbia allowed Sprint and Cellular South to pursue their suits to enjoin AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[I]t has responded to antisemitism with at best deliberate indifference....Columbia Spectator reports on the lawsuit. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:15 am
District of Columbia, Ali and a fellow firefighter, Craig, were late in appearing for a drill. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:09 am
A split has developed between District Court judges in the District of Columbia regarding the requirements to plead a count alleging tortious interference with business expectancy. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:13 am by John Phillips
Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to keep and bear arms for personal use, striking down a District of Columbia ban on handguns in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:50 pm
Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:56 pm by Orin Kerr
I don’t know of any opinions by that court that were published, although there’s a reference to the court in passing in the Reporter’s summary of the procedural history of United States v. [read post]