Search for: "TART v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 11:50 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
The opinion is replete with subtle tartness towards the plaintiffs’ arguments. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
In a very short judgment about asset freezing orders the Court of Appeal has made some tart observations about the inchoate nature of Strasbourg’s rulings. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:29 am
Now, in Tart v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
Tart, 955 F. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:54 am
§ 504(c)(2); see, e.g., Yurman Design, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:36 am
So, of course, I had to look up the case, which is Nix v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Hydrick, 500 F.3d at 1001; see also United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Fritz Zwicky, the tart-tongued scientist (discoverer of, among other things, supernovae and neutron stars) was wont to label his critics in the astrophysical world (of whom there were many) “spherical bastards. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
See Royal v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
§ 1983 and a variety of state law theories. . . . [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:18 pm
Castle v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:06 am
The case, Bond v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:24 am
Kelly v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:11 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRUITImmigration Law'Tart Comments' About Woman's Credibility, Other Errors, Lead to Second Chance at AsylumXiao Ling Zhu v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:45 am
Corp. v United States Liab. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:26 pm
At oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:18 am
That changed in 2015, when the Supreme Court ruled in Kingsley v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
