Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 2,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
In his latest broadside against Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Stuart Taylor revisits Ricci v DeStefano. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The post Spencer v Taylor- Some Analysis appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
 And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 10:11 am
It may not be accidental, then, that Judge Taylor spent more time on the state secrets issue than she did on the merits. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
Cheshire V-at the Duke professors, journalists, and others who had so eagerly joined Nifong's mob. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:06 am
The Taylor case is the jewel in the crown of the SCSL, as it was the first ever trial and conviction of a former African head of state for crimes committed in a neighboring state. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer… [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:03 am by CMS
Following a decision in 2005 by the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Finanzamt Gladback v Linneweber (Case C-453/02), [2005] ECR I-1131, [2008] STC 1069) which stated that VAT was not, and never had been, payable on income attributable to gaming machines, Carlton submitted several claims relating to overpayments of VAT to HMRC. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 12:09 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Taylor–from its peak to its surrounding mesas–as a traditional cultural property on the New Mexico State Register of Cultural Properties.” [read post]