Search for: "THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY" Results 1 - 20 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 3:04 pm by James Bingham
The lawsuits – Salum Restaurant LTD v The Travelers Indemnity Company, case No. 3:20-cv-01034 and Frosch Holdco et al. v The Travelers Indemnity Company, et al., case No. 4:20-cv-0148  – ask for declaratory judgments that Travelers must honor its policies and cover the submitted claims. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:04 pm by James Bingham
The lawsuits – Salum Restaurant LTD v The Travelers Indemnity Company, case No. 3:20-cv-01034 and Frosch Holdco et al. v The Travelers Indemnity Company, et al., case No. 4:20-cv-0148  – ask for declaratory judgments that Travelers must honor its policies and cover the submitted claims. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:07 am by Jensen Varghese and Clayton D. Waterman
In this declaratory judgment action, the court held that defendants Travelers Indemnity Company  and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company  (Travelers) had a duty to defend its insured Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company (Chicago Tool) for silica- and asbestos-related claims, prompting Traveler to file a second amended third party complaint against Chicago Tool’s other insurers, AIU Insurance Company … [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 7:00 am by CJ Haddick
LEXIS 976, which ruled that Travelers Insurance had no duty to defend or indemnify pharmaceutical company insured who was sued by various state and local government units for deceptive practices leading to the overuse and abuse of opioids. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Ostrager of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett   in New York will argue for the Travelers Indemnity Company. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:41 am by scanner1
GULF INSURANCE COMPANY and TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:39 pm by Jennifer E. White
Last Thursday, a federal district judge in New Jersey denied, in part, Travelers Indemnity Company’s (Travelers) motion for summary judgment on claims for indemnity costs because the plaintiff, E.M. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:39 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
Last Thursday, a federal district judge in New Jersey denied, in part, Travelers Indemnity Company’s (Travelers) motion for summary judgment on claims for indemnity costs because the plaintiff, E.M. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Courtney Abrams
Last week the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granted Travelers Indemnity Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment allowing them to dodge hail damage claims made by policyholder Mapleton at Countryside Condominium Association Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
Bennett (not approved for publication)In a case arising from the denial of coverage under comprehensive business insurance issued to the parent company of the plaintiff ("Bolton Partners") by the defendant ("Travelers"), and upon consideration of the parties' cross motions for summary judgment, the judge DENIED Bolton Partners' motion for partial summary judgment and GRANTED Travelers' motion for summary judgment.In the course of… [read post]
Nov. 25, 2014), the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the insurers, Arrowood Indemnity Company, Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, XL Insurance America, Inc., and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, finding that the insurers were not obligated to defend and indemnify Dish Network Corporation or Dish Network, LLC (collectively Dish Network) due to exclusions present in… [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:57 pm by James Bingham
The Dallas Morning News has published a story on Salum Restaurant, which Fears Nachawati is representing after Travelers Indemnity Company wrongly denied coverage for losses sustained during the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]