Search for: "TWiT"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,487
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2021, 4:04 am
Many people twitted about it, as people do. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
And the leaders of this “movement” of PD Twitter gained prominence on social media, grew huge followings and became credible, not for anything they did, but for their zealous twitting of what their sycophants wanted to hear. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:10 am
And is the wont of public defenders, this gave rise to a shitstorm of outrage, reflected in the replies to Stewart and a flurry of quote twits. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 3:31 am
His reply was a non-sequitur, but it wasn’t entirely unfair since my twit was vague enough to be open to challenge from many sides, even if his question was more an effort to avoid the point than address it. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 5:04 am
While it’s obviously false that someone can text their vote, this was twitted to Vaughn’s followers, not targeted at anyone else. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:22 am
Blog posts took more words and effort to write and read than a twit, and required something that few really wanted to endure: thought. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:37 am
Burnett was the target of cancellation a few months ago for an unpleasant but otherwise unremarkable twit about Mike Pence. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:07 am
Others take very different views of the pardon power, many outraged at it being used for corrupt purposes and thus arguing that it must be constrained or, as one woman who speaks “as a lawyer,” contends: Obviously, the twitter warning label that this twit is batshit crazy malfunctioned, to the detriment of a few folks who might assume that a lawyer would both be sufficiently competent not to twit something so flagrantly wrong or so shameless as to let her delusions fly… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 3:42 am
Hi this is the liberal lesbian of the family who has been kicked out multiple times for her views and for going to BLM protests to care what happens to me so: Mom: Therese DukeUncle: Richard LorenzAunt: Annie Lorenz pic.twitter.com/cuBAPJ3GJA — Helena Duke (@duke_helena) January 7, 2021 There’s a lack of clarity here, whether she was thrown out of the house or not, and if so, the reasons why, and one should be very cautious about reading too much into these twits. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:16 am
And if you think it’s an acceptable price to pay to rid social media of the nuts, what makes you think your next twit won’t be viewed by someone, or some algo, as an expression Jack Dorsey can do without? [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 4:23 am
Today, a well-placed twit can do it in milliseconds. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 3:20 am
Is there really any interest in reading something longer than a twit? [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:18 am
Trump may have demanded the repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as part of the defense spending bill, but that was just Trump being self-serving Trump, his twits labeled as false and his ridiculous claims being rejected for being ridiculous. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
This series of twits presents the issue in extreme focus. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:05 am
” All of this came back to me when I saw a twit applying the singular “they” in legal writing. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:48 am
The former because his twits are labeled as false, and his sycophants keep being tossed off social media for being too violent, crazy or absurdly false. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:07 am
As I argued with Radley Balko following his twit challenging Yglesias: We’ve spent far too much time reducing an extremely complex problem into a simplistic solution to fit into this shallow medium for passionate people with 8 second attention spans. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 4:58 am
Curiously, the prawf who initiated this response deleted his twit, likely to avoid the unanticipated potential backlash of appearing to disagree with a black law professor. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:18 am
It’s usually because of something I’ve written here or twitted of which someone disapproves. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 3:55 am
That struck a nerve with me, despite the fact that the myriad suits brought, and bizarre claims twitted, fail to meet the minimal requirements of plausibility, evidentiary support or adequacy to sustain the relief sought. [read post]