Search for: "Tapia v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 12:17 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeAcquittal Judgment Denied; Evidence of Heroin Conspiracy, Role Therein Supported Jury's Verdict United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:13 am by Kiran Bhat
United States and reached different results in cases involving the revocation of a defendant’s supervised release. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
., patent or trade mark infringement, (2) importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation into the United States of the accused products, and (3) the existence of a domestic industry relating to the product in question. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Aaron Pelley Federal Law United States Supreme Court Bond v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:25 am by Adam Chandler
Finally, at Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman has a post on Tapia v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05  Cress v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 5:59 am by The Swartz Law Firm
United States, in which the Eleventh Circuit held that a district court errs whenever it considers rehabilitation when imposing or lengthening a sentence of imprisonment. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
  They're warehouses.Yesterday, the unanimous Supreme Court said (Tapia v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 12:08 am by Jeff Gamso
A couple of weeks ago, the Supreme Court ruled in Tapia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Ayala-Tapia, No. 06-2781 A conviction and sentence for importing and possessing with intent to distribute heroin are affirmed where: 1) the government presented sufficient evidence for a rational jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant "knew" she was carrying drugs; and 2) defendant failed to meet the statutory requirements for the "safety valve" exception to apply to her case. [read post]