Search for: "Tate v. Norton"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On 1 February 2023, the Supreme Court gave judgment on the private nuisance case of Fearn & Ors v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
But patent infringement does not require that one should be aware that one is infringing: "whether or not a person is working [an] … invention is an objective fact independent of what he knows or thinks about what he is doing": Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc v H N Norton & Co Ltd [1996] R.P.C. 76 , 90. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
On 12 February 2019 Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2019] EWHC 246 (Ch) which was an Article 8 and nuisance claim arising out of the fact that the claimants’ flats are overlooked by a viewing platform at the Tate Gallery. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The Norton Rose Fulbright Blog has more information here. [read post]
