Search for: "Tate v. Sharpe" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed,  Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 12 February 2019 Mann J handed down judgment in the case of Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2019] EWHC 246 (Ch) which was an Article 8 and nuisance claim arising out of the fact that the claimants’ flats are overlooked by a viewing platform at the Tate Gallery. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
  We have already posted on Mrs Justice Sharp’s important judgment in DFT v TFD – available on Bailii [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB). [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources Helberger and Diakopoulos, ChatGPT and the AI Act (2023), Internet Policy Review 12(1) Kenney, Cortelyou C., Defamation 2.0 (2023), Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 56(1) Park, Eunice, The AI Bill of Rights: A Step in the Right Direction (2023), Orange County Lawyer Magazine, Vol. 65(2) McBride, Nicholas, ‘A Straightforward Case of Nuisance’: A Note on Fearn v Tate Gallery [2023] UKSC 4 (2023) Univer [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 09380-19 Clattenburg v dailystar.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08479-19 Forbes v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 08417-19 Cooney et al. v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 08376-19 Malone v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), 2 Privacy (2019), 10… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
Allen v Bloomsbury Publishing Plc & Anor (1709 Blog) (IP Whiteboard) The chips are down in spud-separator shoot-off – EWCA judgment in Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co KG v Derek Scott (trading as Scotts Potato Machinery) (IPKat) (EPLAW) Tate & Lyle v Roquette Frères: meticulous verbal analysis? [read post]