Search for: "Tate v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 427
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am by Matrix Law
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 2/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 11/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am by Jocelyn Hutton
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 1:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard… [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 of DCM (Optical Holdings) v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 12th October 2022. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Tuesday 4th October, the Court heard the case of R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Mail-order retailers, for instance, have to comply with the often byzantine tax rules of many states, even though "[s]tate taxes differ, not only in the rate imposed but also in the categories of goods that are taxed and, sometimes, the relevant date of purchase. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
AA (Nigeria), RA (Iraq) and HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKSC 22 – on appeal from [2020] EWCA 1296 and [2020] EWCA 1176. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by Peter J. Sluka
This means that if a departing partner takes a contingent fee case and subsequently litigates it to settlement or verdict, the dissolved firm is entitled to the value of the case at the date of dissolution, with interest, or, “[s]tated conversely, the lawyer must remit to his former firm the settlement value, less that amount attributable to the lawyer’s efforts after the firm’s dissolution” (Murov v Ades, 12 AD3d 654, 656 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]