Search for: "Tate v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 7:54 am
E.P.A. and Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 8:09 am
Kai Tate Mann won in State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:40 am
The Court in State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Cupek v. [read post]
26 Nov 2022, 6:52 am
” Light v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Settling a disciplinary action by agreeing to disciplinary probationMatter of Campbell v State of New York, 37 AD3d 993The New York State Office of Mental Health [OMH] filed disciplinary charges against Monica A. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm
Younge in Hepp v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
NFP criminal opinions today (8): Jesse Tate v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:36 pm
Judge Areces takes the first hit in our 3rd DCA roundup in State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:46 am
”As the Supreme Court held in Nelson v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:41 pm
In Mengle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
Article V provides that, "on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states," Congress "shall call a convention for proposing amendments. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
[State of Tennessee v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
Tate Access Floors, Inc., 31 F.Supp.2d 524, 528 (D.Md.1999). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
