Search for: "Tate v. Tate"
Results 101 - 120
of 589
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Keenan, decided Feb. 5 by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct but just posted on Westlaw (some paragraph breaks and numbering deleted); the opinion is signed by members Ruth Reukauf, Robert Alsdorf, Ramon Alvarez, Wanda Briggs, Kristian Hedine, Rich Melnick, and Michael Tate: At all times pertinent hereto, Judge Keenan was a Superior Court Judge [in the civil department] for King County, Washington…. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
” Argentine Republic v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
On Tuesday 7th and Wednesday 8th December the court will hear the case of Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:52 pm
"] From Doe v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm
Firstly, the Judge considered she was bound by Fearn & Ors v The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104, in which the Court of Appeal held that the mere overlooking from one property to another was not capable of giving rise to a cause of action in private nuisance. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Tate v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Tate v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 5:22 pm
As has been widely reported (CNN), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals early today in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:15 am
appeared first on Tate Law Offices, PC. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:15 am
appeared first on Tate Law Offices, PC. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:24 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Bad acts Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County of distribution of cocaine and related offenses, Donald Edward Tate, appellant, presents for our review two questions: whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible hearsay into evidence,” and whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible and prejudicial ‘other ... [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:52 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm
The Appellate Division, noting that the "sole issue preserved for [its] review is whether the determination allocating a salary grade 18 to the newly created Financial Services Examiner 1 title had a rational basis," explained that §118 of the Civil Service Law vests DCC's Director with the authority "to classify and reclassify all positions in the classified civil service of the [s]tate and to make such revisions in the classification and compensation of positions… [read post]
