Search for: "Taylor v. Bell" Results 41 - 60 of 95
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
En banc Fifth Circuit decides student off-campus First Amendment free speech dispute in Taylor Bell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
Significantly, Justice Scalia begins by noting that the Court ruled twenty-five years ago in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
 Never too late 35 [week ending Sunday 1 March] – EPO v SUEPO | Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd | UK IPO on EPO | Scents and copyright | GIs under scrutiny | UPC test-drive | Is UK failing to protect innovation? [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
Click here to find outLantana the movie hereLatest Australian jurisprudence on the same issue in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150, noted on Patentology here. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Nov. 28, 2007) (applying Twombly “plausible on its face” standard in context of fraudulent joinder; denying remand); Taylor v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm by Dan Gauss
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Verdi v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP ; 2012 NY Slip Op 01243 ; Decided on February 14, 2012 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  and Schurz v Bodian ;2012 NY Slip Op 01235 ; Decided on February 14, 2012 ;Appellate Division, Second Department  both tell us: "The Supreme Court properly, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination denying the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, since the defendants failed to make… [read post]