Search for: "Taylor v. Bell" Results 61 - 80 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
Bell, 10-8629, is one of this week’s hardest-to-read cases. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Forty-four years have brought many changes, while other things have remained surprisingly the same: Bell-bottoms are back, James Taylor is still singing, the Chicago Bears are yet again working on a rebuild — and, yes, we are still debating race-based admissions criteria. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm by Dan Gauss
The tracking happened before the Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The day the bell tolled for Ma Bell. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Mark Lewis Law v Taylor Hampton, heard 25-27 and 30-31 October 2017 (Moulder J). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In 2015, IJOEH was acquired by the Taylor & Francis publishing group, which, in short order, declined to renew Egilman’s contract to serve as editor. [read post]
Christie’s Inc. is illustrative.[27]  In Berkowitz, the trustees of Elizabeth Taylor’s estate sued the auction house Christie’s for breach of contract, declaratory judgment, and breach of fiduciary duty, among other claims, after Christie’s rescinded the $8.8 million sale of the “Taj Mahal Diamond” from the Taylor estate. [read post]