Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education of City School District"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Is a school board authorized to conduct performance evaluations of school district administrators? [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v… [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
In contrast, in Cohoes City School District v Cohoes Teachers Association, 40 NY2d 774, the Court of Appeals ruled that contractual provisions between an employee association and an appointing authority may set out procedural safeguards concerning the tenure decision that are subject to grievance arbitration procedures without offending public policy. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
For example, in Matter of the Board of Education of the Unadilla Valley Central School District, 97 AD3d 1078, the Appellate Division held that a disciplinary settlement agreement that provided that the appointing authority waived its right to bring certain charges against an individual barred it from subsequently bring charges based on the same event[s] or omission[s] while in Shuler v State of New York, 48 AD3d 384, the court sustained a provision… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
Board of Education, New York City School District, 298 A.D.2d 60 In United Federation of Teachers [UFT] v Board of Education, an action taken to confirm an arbitration award, the critical issue concerned the degree of discretion enjoyed by an employer in determining the "most qualified applicant to fill a vacancy. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The union claimed that the School District had agreed to be bound by the "rule of one" under a contract negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The union claimed that the School District had agreed to be bound by the "rule of one" under a contract negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Board, the [individual] had no office at the hearing [see 600 West 115th St. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
For example, Sections 2510, 2588 and 3013 of the Education Law, among other sections, controls with respect to the layoff of tenured teachers and administrators employed by a school district or a BOCES.In addition, Rules of the Board of Regents must be considered. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The seminal case in New York Stateregarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
The layoff provisions set out in the Civil Service Law apply to those individuals in the classified service while the layoff provisions set out in the Education Law control in layoffs involving BOCES and school district employees in the unclassified service.Layoff rights are a function of an individual’s appointment status and the jurisdictional classification of the position in which the individual is serving. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 6:56 am
Ashtabula Area City Schools Board of Education, 2008-Ohio-1892 (11th Dist.) [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:01 am
It said that Syracuse claim relied a decision by the Appellate Division, Third Department, Deposit Central School District v PERB, 214 AD2d 288, holding that the notice of claim requirement in Education Law Section 3813 is a condition precedent to PERB's exercise of jurisdiction over an improper practice charge. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
Taylor Pyne Prize, the highest honor Princeton awards to an undergraduate. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
The Board also acted arbitrarily and capriciously in altering the audit standards for Music Choice. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
COMMERCIAL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, A DIVISION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF FORT WORTH; from Tarrant County; 2nd district (02-08-00294-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 05-14-09, pet. denied Oct 2009) (zoning board decision appeal)09-0615 KATHRYN ANN RACKLEY v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
Citing Matter of Bernstein [Norwich City School Dist. [read post]
