Search for: "Taylor v. Brown" Results 201 - 220 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am by John Elwood
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a brief dissent that the authority had not shown any real emergency justifying the court’s intervention at that stage. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 9:36 am
They also kept the privileged material (NCIC/TCIC, prosecutor notes, witness statements, etc) in a brown envelope marked "privileged. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 13, 2009 Taylor v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
Browning Editor’s note: The following story is reprinted with permission from the Fall 2013 Texas Entertainment and Sports Law Journal. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Brown, No. 05-5462 Judgment resentencing defendant to 84 months' imprisonment in light of his prior state-law conviction of third-degree burglary, considered as a crime of violence, and his possession of firearms whose serial numbers had been obliterated, is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) increasing defendant's offense level; and 2) his sentence is unreasonable. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
The Georgia Court of Appeals handed down the case of In re Mahmoodzadeh on Monday, clarifying that a petition for year's support cannot be challenged in probate court on the basis of the validity of the title to property to be set aside. [read post]