Search for: "Taylor v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 1,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 3:38 am by Robert L Abell
The Kentucky Court of Appeals has assured us that Kentucky's Dram Shop Act did survive its decision in Taylor v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 2:05 am
Estate of Marcos, 103 F.3d 767 (9th Cir. 1996), and Doe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Investigations and the Taylor lawCity of New York v DeCosta, 95 NY2d 2731. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
We should have a more detailed post on Spencer v Taylor coming along in a few days, as there was much about the Court of Appeal judgment that didn’t make a great deal of sense on first reading, but does with background. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor Law New York City Tr. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:55 am
Criminal investigations and the Taylor lawNew York City v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso., 95 NY2d 273With increasing frequency, procedures addressing employee rights in the course of an employer-initiated investigation are being included in Taylor Law agreements. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by Bill
"I'm not so sure that this is true, and I didn't have to strain to come up with a counter-example: Felix Frankfurter, appointed by FDR, voted to uphold the expulsion of Jehovah's Witnesses who refused to pledge the flag at school; voted with the minority in Baker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP ([2017] EWCA Civ 74) reverses a decision by the High Court that the law firm Taylor Wessing had not breached the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) by refusing to carry out searches on grounds of proportionality, legal privilege and improper purpose. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:00 am
Legislative approval of a grievance settlement that does not change the terms and conditions of controlling Taylor Law contract is not required Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of Long Beach, Inc. v City of Long Beach, 57 AD3d 499 This litigation involved efforts by the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association [PBA] to enforce three stipulations executed by the parties in settlement of three grievances initiated by the PBA pursuant to the terms of its collective… [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor LawNew York City Tr. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A collective bargaining agreement [CBA] entered into pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, is a contract and must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms (Matter of Lin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 191 AD3d 431, leave to appeal denied, 37 NY3d 913). [read post]