Search for: "Taylor v. Georgia" Results 121 - 140 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 89225 (ED PA, June 30, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was unable to pray on a single day when he was kept in handcuffs for over two hours.In Taylor v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:45 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 126242 (SD GA, Sept. 4, 2013), a Georgia federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate be permitted to proceed on his complaint that defendant improperly ended his religious meals.In Taylor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Taylor, II, and Wendy Jean ConnorCase number: 12-cv-1249 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)Case filed: April 12, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 7, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-33 SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 9:26 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 47595, March 7, 2013) and dismissed for lack of prosecution an inmate's complaint that he is not allowed to attend Jumah and other Islamic services.In Taylor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
In contrast, Citibank asserts that McNeal is wrongly decided and that the intervening Supreme Court decision of Dewsnup v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 4:40 am by Scott Riddle
In contrast, Citibank asserts that McNeal is wrongly decided and that the intervening Supreme Court decision of Dewsnup v. [read post]