Search for: "Taylor v. Gordon" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 3:33 am by Firemark Law Team
 Disney Misused ‘Star Wars,’ ‘Frozen’ Copyrights, Says Judge (in Redbox Case) 2 (follow up) Taylor Swift Wins Legal Battle Over ‘Shake It Off’ 3 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 4:11 pm
By Jay Gordon TaylorIn an artful job of issue dodging and a narrowly focused reading of the Patent Act, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has dodged the key issue in Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ldt. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Renhcol, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Max Clifford and Gordon Taylor have already sued the News of the World and Glenn Mulcaire for damages and reportedly settled their claims for very substantial damages. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
The Appellate Division decided that Taylor’s dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:23 am
Disciplinary proceedures set out in a collective bargaining agreement trumped the Civil Service Commission’s probationary termination rulesGordon v Town of Queensbury, App. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:18 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
If we consider that Prince’s purpose for reproducing Eric McNatt’s photograph of Kim Gordon was to comment on social media, as claimed by Prince’s attorneys in the Graham v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Chinmayi Sharma
When asked by Chairman Adam Schiff him whether Burisma was included in the call package as a topic to discuss on the call with Zelensky, Morrison’s counsel instructed him not to answer the question, citing U.S. v. [read post]