Search for: "Taylor v. McDonald"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
RODNEY MCDONALD WILLIAMS Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 13 June 2018 by Judge Henry W. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
Protecting health insurance benefits after retirementRocco v City of Schenectady, App. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
Retiree health insurance benefitsAeneas McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, App. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:12 pm
Novotny, 442 U.S. 366, 371 (1979); see Taylor v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:34 pm
We are doing to send to Burnestine Taylor, M.D. a box of “Poisoned” books. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
If a past practice involving a mandatory subject of negotiation is established the Taylor Law bars the employer from unilaterally discontinuing that practice Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:20 pm
” Taylor, 561 N.E.2d at 672. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
"The court also noted that the Village was not barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from terminating Plaintiff’s post-retirement health care benefits.In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:47 am
Their luck is unlikely to change with Taylor. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 8:49 am
Omicron Capital, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:55 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
McDonald (wrongful arrest) In re Krystal Energy Co. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:18 am
In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a Taylor Law agreement nor some other contract or provision of law granting retirees a vested right to such a benefit [emphasis supplied]. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
”The Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
”*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Burnham and UFT, 28 PERB 4590, PERB ruled that the union's "duty of fair representation" runs only to employees; there is no such duty with respect to former unit members such as retirees [See, also, McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326; Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344].** Retirees are not employees for the purposes of collective bargaining for the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] The decision… [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
"*** The Court of Appeals has already decided that health insurance for retirees is not a retirement benefit protected against being diminished or impaired by the State's Constitution [Lippman v Sewanhaka Central High School District, 66 NY2d 313].** Regarding a municipality's providing health insurance benefits to its retirees, in McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, a decision that could significantly affect a municipal retiree's… [read post]
