Search for: "Taylor v. Patten"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2006, 9:18 pm
Tatum), Judge Taylor rightly rejected the standing argument in ACLU v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
Patten LJ, giving the only reasoned judgment in this case, sided with Taylor. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
On a balancing exercise, the Court found that an Article 8 challenge would have no real prospects of success and a possession order was made.Comment: it is interesting to observe in this case a focus on the decision to continue with proceedings rather than to start them, which one gets from Central Bedfordshire v Taylor para. 40 and Pinnock para.45. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
On a balancing exercise, the Court found that an Article 8 challenge would have no real prospects of success and a possession order was made.Comment: it is interesting to observe in this case a focus on the decision to continue with proceedings rather than to start them, which one gets from Central Bedfordshire v Taylor para. 40 and Pinnock para.45. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Waller LJ gives the judgment of the CA, but Patten LJ gives a supporting judgment which specifically considers the position in Manchester CC v Mushin. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Waller LJ gives the judgment of the CA, but Patten LJ gives a supporting judgment which specifically considers the position in Manchester CC v Mushin. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
Lord Patten’s speech to the Society of Editors conference on Sunday 13 November – on ethics and journalism after NOTW – can be found at this link. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/09/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
