Search for: "Taylor v. Sanders et al"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2016, 8:25 am
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, the 80-20 National Asian American Educational Foundation, et al, in Support of Petitioner Brief for Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner Brief for the Pacific Legal Foundation, Center for Equal Opportunity, the American Civil Rights Institute, the National Association of Scholars, and Project 21 in Support of Petitioner Brief for Scholars of Econmics and Statistics in Support of Petitioner Brief for Southeastern… [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Iqbal, et al. and Sawyer, et al. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
The case was Orkin, et al., v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm
Using data gathered by the university, Arcidiacono et al found that this narrowing was illusory. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
The Court will hear the case of Ashcroft, et al., v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
” • Although studies have shown modest reductions in some vitamins and other nutrients after pasteurization of milk, these changes are insignificant according to a review by Potter et al (1984), human nutrition studies have shown no advantage of raw over pasteurized milk. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
