Search for: "Taylor v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2016, 11:07 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
The Ninth Circuit takes a stab at this question in Taylor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 2:07 pm
Same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide a few months after James’ death, and Michael brought a class action lawsuit in federal court against the Social Security Administration. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:20 pm
The North Carolina state regulators issued a final administrative cease-and-desist order against Taylor and City Capital Corp., among others, on March 29th. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:00 am
"*If the election workers are covered by a Section 218 Agreement with the Social Security Administration (SSA), the terms of the Agreement will determine whether the payments are subject to FICA.** A candidate seeking election to a school board is typically deemed to be seeking office in a “non-partisan” election. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:29 am
Romeril] Once censorship to regulate “online harms” gets its foothold the topics of its meddlesome ambition will expand [Charles Hymas on demands in Britain that “body shaming” in social media be subject to legal sanction] Tags: free speech, online speech, Securities and Exchange Commission, social media [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5155 September 8, 2011 Judge: Briscoe Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Petitioner Becky Jean Willig appealed an opinion and order entered by a United States Magistrate Judge that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying her application for supplemental security income benefits. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Simcox v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:21 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
No other change was made to the rule and there is no dispute that the relevant number of days of sick leave that may be applied for retirement purposes is 165 days in accordance with Retirement and Social Security Law §41[j][1][a].The rule was uniformly interpreted and applied to all separating administrative employees, whether their separation was due to retirement or not, so that only those employees who left service with more than 165 days of sick leave… [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
On 1 December 2022, judgement was handed down in Taylor v Victorian Institute of Teaching (Human Rights) [2022] VCAT 1367. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Public officers and employees may engage in outside employment, aka “moonlighting,” subject to certain restrictions and limitationsKastoff v NYS Dept. of Social Services, 195 A.D.2d 808"Moonlighting" has been a common practice in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Case Study: The SEC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
Dafoe, Taylor. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
deals with the issues The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd began this week before Moulder J. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
See Grant v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
