Search for: "Taylor v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 3,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The employer's annual reviewing and approving requests for the assignment an agency vehicle to an employee does not create a past practiceSpence v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2018 NY Slip Op 08594, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCertain employees serving with Department of Transportation [DOT] were assigned state-owned vehicles for work and, in some instances, several employees seeking to use the vehicle for commuting as well as for work was authorized.Wayne… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The employer's annual reviewing and approving requests for the assignment an agency vehicle to an employee does not create a past practiceSpence v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2018 NY Slip Op 08594, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentCertain employees serving with Department of Transportation [DOT] were assigned state-owned vehicles for work and, in some instances, several employees seeking to use the vehicle for commuting as well as for work was authorized.Wayne… [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am by Daniel Jin
Authored by Francesca Cassidy-Taylor On Friday 23 April, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in R v Umerji [2021] EWCA Crim 598. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:14 am
Vernon v PERB, 289 A.D.2d 674, motion for leave to appeal denied, 97 N.Y.2d 613In considering the appeal of the City of Mt. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”*** Much the same argument would apply to retirees of the State as the employer who retired prior to the effective date of the President’s Regulation as such retirees are not employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law nor did they receive any benefit with respect to job security as, like judges, retirees cannot be “laid off. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
From: Findlaw Opinion Summaries June 12, 2008: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CIVIL PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRADE SECRETS Taylor v. [read post]