Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2007, 2:40 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:44 am
The relationship of a statute to the provisions of a Taylor Law agreement Civil Service Employees Association v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
Alleged violations of a "Memorandum of Understanding" to a Taylor Law agreement may not be subject to contract grievance proceduresPine Plains CSD v Federation of Teachers, 248 A.D.2d 612It is not unusual for parties to a collective bargaining agreement to agree to provisions set out in a “supplemental agreement” or to sign a “memorandum of understanding” in the course of collective bargaining pursuant to the Taylor Law.Typically this… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:41 pm
Sandell v Taylor-Listug (California Court of Appeals No. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:50 am
Here are the materials in Nygaard v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
* The decision, City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor LawNew York City Tr. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Earlier this week, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Earlier this week, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 7:42 am
Taylor v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:50 pm
MARSHALL V. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:45 am
Limitations on collective bargaining under the Taylor LawCity of New York v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]