Search for: "Taylor v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
Google * Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Confidential investigators employed by the New York State Department of Law are "confidential" employees within the meaning of the Taylor Law pursuant to §201.7(b).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02812.htm [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
Mullen v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:09 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:16 am
The following law review articles relating to securities regulation are now available in paper format: Taylor Essner, Note, Insider Trading in Flux: Explaining the Second Circuit's Error in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am
The State Constitution’s prohibition of gifts of public funds is not necessarily applicable in situations involving labor-management relations between public employees and public employers under the Taylor Law2015 NY Slip Op 03837, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIntroducing its decision in this appeal with the statement "Judicial review of an arbitrator's award is extremely limited," the Appellate Division explained that "A party seeking to overturn… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant relied on State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 3:00 am
In giving the lead judgment, Lord Sumption stated that s 12A of the Theft Act imposes strict liability only to the extent that anyone who was party to the taking of the vehicle (and in the immediate vicinity at the time of the injury) commits the offence, whether or not he was driving at the time. [read post]
18 May 2009, 4:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OT (A Child), Re [2009] EWCA Civ 409 (14 May 2009) Secretary of State for Defence v Smith, R (on the application of) [2009] EWCA Civ 441 (18 May 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Girma & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2009] EWCA Crim 912 (15 May 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Taylor v HMP [...] [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
State v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:07 am
But State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 9:18 pm
Tatum), Judge Taylor rightly rejected the standing argument in ACLU v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 6:17 am
Serang DA 20-0416 2021 MT 118N Civil – Other State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Source: Taylor-Tillotson v.... [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Source: Taylor-Tillotson v.... [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 6:40 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
Similarly, in Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn., 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division ruled that a CBA provision that allowed a teacher to be absent with pay on "any of the religious holidays designated by the New York State Commissioner of Education" without charging his or her absence to leave credits violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
