Search for: "Taylor v. State Bar"
Results 41 - 60
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In dictum, the Court of Appeal cited a recent SCOTUS case, Taylor v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 8:14 pm
Thankfully, however, attorneys can’t concede for their clients (at least, can’t concede plea facts that haunt later Taylor analyses).United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:01 pm
On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 4:18 am
Taylor v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Bar Assn., Local 237 Intl. v City of New York, 99 AD2d 264, affirmed 64 NY2d 188.* Finding that PERB's decision regarding Petitioner's fair representation claim had "a rational basis," the Appellate Division said it "must affirm" PERB's determination. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Bar Assn., Local 237 Intl. v City of New York, 99 AD2d 264, affirmed 64 NY2d 188.* Finding that PERB's decision regarding Petitioner's fair representation claim had "a rational basis," the Appellate Division said it "must affirm" PERB's determination. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Brown Jr. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
A slow week in the Ninth lets us reach back to discuss the strong decision by Judge Goodwin in United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Grieving alleged out-of-title work assignmentsBailey v GOER, 259 AD2d 940Sometimes a Taylor Law contract will include a provision barring unit members from being assigned to perform “out-of-title” work. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm
Today, the 5th Circuit clarified a procedural hurdle to that tactic in a small category of cases.In Taylor v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm
Today, the 5th Circuit clarified a procedural hurdle to that tactic in a small category of cases.In Taylor v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:24 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003)); Learners Online, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Michalski v Bar-Levav, 463 Mich 723 (2001). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Here is the abstract: In Graham v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
Taylor (Guardianship - Domestic Violence Protection Order)Arnold v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
From: Findlaw Opinion Summaries June 12, 2008: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, CIVIL PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW, TRADE SECRETS Taylor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
The State reported on the judge's ruling from the bench:Senior U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
If a past practice involving a mandatory subject of negotiation is established the Taylor Law bars the employer from unilaterally discontinuing that practice Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
