Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2018, 2:12 am
Claims made by Carlton were not properly regarded as claims made by Taylor Clark as representative of the VAT Group. [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 4:05 am
Converse Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:00 am
Legislative approval of a grievance settlement that does not change the terms and conditions of controlling Taylor Law contract is not required Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of Long Beach, Inc. v City of Long Beach, 57 AD3d 499 This litigation involved efforts by the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association [PBA] to enforce three stipulations executed by the parties in settlement of three grievances initiated by the PBA pursuant to the terms of its collective… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Legislative approval of grievances settlement that do not change the terms and conditions of controlling Taylor Law contract is not requiredPatrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of Long Beach, Inc. v City of Long Beach, 2008 NY Slip Op 09573, Decided on December 2, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThis litigation involved efforts by the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association [PBA] to enforce three stipulations executed by the parties in settlement of three grievances… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 5:47 pm
Appellate Term, First Department: Taylor v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 3:21 am
From an unpublished California Court of Appeal opinion, Robbins v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 2:30 pm
In the case of McDowell v City of Detroit, Taylor's court threw the family of six dead children out of court by finding that the landlord had no duty to fix the electrical system even though the family had repeatedly complained about sparks and smoke coming from the outlet. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Earlier this week, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:55 pm
Efforts at reforming this broken system got a big boost in 2014, when the Supreme Court decided the Alice v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:52 am
Taylor had an explicitly [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:28 pm
Nixon Peabody v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:35 am
By Dennis Crouch James Taylor v Taylor Made Plastics (Fed. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:32 am
Sims, as well as Justice Harlan's largely forgotten dissent in Taylor v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:16 am
On May 13, 2010, the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the trial court in State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:19 am
USA v. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
From Judge Edgardo Ramos's decision Tuesday in Jacob v. [read post]
