Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 201 - 220 of 4,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:00 am
Legislative approval of a grievance settlement that does not change the terms and conditions of controlling Taylor Law contract is not required Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of Long Beach, Inc. v City of Long Beach, 57 AD3d 499 This litigation involved efforts by the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association [PBA] to enforce three stipulations executed by the parties in settlement of three grievances initiated by the PBA pursuant to the terms of its collective… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Legislative approval of grievances settlement that do not change the terms and conditions of controlling Taylor Law contract is not requiredPatrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of Long Beach, Inc. v City of Long Beach, 2008 NY Slip Op 09573, Decided on December 2, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThis litigation involved efforts by the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association [PBA] to enforce three stipulations executed by the parties in settlement of three grievances… [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm
Earlier this week, the Florida Third District Court of Appeal issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 2:30 pm
In the case of McDowell v City of Detroit, Taylor's court threw the family of six dead children out of court by finding that the landlord had no duty to fix the electrical system even though the family had repeatedly complained about sparks and smoke coming from the outlet. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:16 am by Russell Mace
On May 13, 2010, the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the trial court in State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 7:29 am by Brian Langille
By Brian Langille and Saambavi Mano (University of Toronto, Faculty of Law) Taylor v Hanley Hospitality… [read post]