Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 61 - 80 of 3,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2008, 2:28 am
There are surprising few reported cases concerning Wills Variation Act claims of minor children.In reasons for judgment released last week, in K.D.M.B. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:27 am
Elizabeth Taylor gets to keep Van Gogh's painting Vue de l'Asile et de la Chapelle de Saint-Rémy. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:11 am
Litigating the Taylor Law in federal courtSchermerhorn v Metropolitan Trans. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 4:12 am
Today is the tenth anniversary of Best v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 11:12 am
Over at the National Journal, Stuart Taylor has a very interesting column on Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:58 am
Exhausting of Taylor Law contract remediesKaufmann v Rochester CSD, App. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
In his latest broadside against Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Stuart Taylor revisits Ricci v DeStefano. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
Cheshire V-at the Duke professors, journalists, and others who had so eagerly joined Nifong's mob. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:48 am
Collective bargaining after the Taylor Law Agreement expiresLocal 2562 v PERB, App. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:21 pm
Richard Nagareda (Vanderbilt) has recorded a SCOTUScast on Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 4:34 am
Failure to use existing Taylor Law contract disciplinary procedures to discipline police officers following the Court of Appeals ruling in Town of Wallkill v Civil Serv. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
The post Spencer v Taylor – section 21 news appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:22 pm
On June 12, 2008, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of a FOIA requester in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The decision in Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP ([2017] EWCA Civ 74) reverses a decision by the High Court that the law firm Taylor Wessing had not breached the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) by refusing to carry out searches on grounds of proportionality, legal privilege and improper purpose. [read post]