Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
Barzun, University of Virginia School of Law, has posted Quentin Skinner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:26 am
Case citation: Taylor v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 10:11 am
Why did Judge Taylor rush out such a sloppy opinion in the way she did? [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 7For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Adamson & Ors v Paddico (267) Ltd; Taylor (on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Markham and Little Francis) v Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Ltd [2014] UKSC 7 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:31 pm
The post Taylor Swift vs Song Writers Copyright Infringement, Part 1 appeared first on Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 3:59 am
Taylor v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
In Rayellen Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
Burch v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
Can't the California Supreme Court wait a couple of days to tell Keith Taylor that he's going to die? [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:35 pm
Taylor. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 1:27 pm
(For more on the "true threat" exception to the First Amendment, see Watts v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
A collective bargaining agreement [CBA] entered into pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, is a contract and must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms (Matter of Lin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 191 AD3d 431, leave to appeal denied, 37 NY3d 913). [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
A collective bargaining agreement [CBA] entered into pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, is a contract and must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms (Matter of Lin v New York City Dept. of Educ., 191 AD3d 431, leave to appeal denied, 37 NY3d 913). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Tests for determining the “arbitrability” of Taylor Law contract provisionsOdessa-Montour CSD v Odessa-Montour Teachers Asso., 271 AD2d 931The Odessa-Montour decision by the Appellate Division, Third Department applied the guidelines set out in the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Watertown City School District v Watertown Education Association, 93 NY2d 132. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:21 pm
Orkin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Furthermore, in paragraph 182 of its judgment in Prosecutor v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer… [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:09 am
Carlton was previously a member of a VAT Group, of which Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (“Taylor Clark”) was the representative member. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:13 am
Jurisdiction to resolve an impasse in collective bargaining under the Taylor LawPolice Benevolent Association v City of New York, 285 A.D.2d 52 In a unanimous ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB] has exclusive jurisdiction insofar as resolving Taylor Law impasse situations are concerned. [read post]
