Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 161 - 180 of 4,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The scenario may sound far-fetched and unfair, but it’s what the Supreme Court could open the door to if it rules in favor of a similarly opportunistic defendant in Unicolors v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The then-incumbent Food Safety and Inspection Service Administrator, Mike Taylor, became the acting Under Secretary from October 1994 to November 1996. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
”[4] [1] Hay v African Gold Recovery Co 1902 TS 232 p 233. [2] University of Southampton’s Applications [2006] RPC 567 (CA) paras 22–25. [3] Bertie Van Zyl (Pty) Ltd v Minister for Safety and Security 2010 (2) SA 181 (CC) para 21. [4] Josh Taylor, “I’m sorry Dave I’m afraid I invented that: Australian court finds AI systems can be recognised under patent law,” The Guardian (July 30, 2021)… [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
Taylor v Buchanan – does it violate the First Amendment to force Michigan lawyers to pay money to join their Bar Association? [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm by Richard Hunt
Early last month the Department of Justice filed a “Statement of Interest” in Migyanko v. [read post]