Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor et al" Results 1 - 20 of 377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 8:11 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure — Valid ownership interest On October 5, 2015, appellees, Carrie Ward, et al., Substitute Trustees, 1 initiated foreclosure proceedings as to a residential property owned by Paul Taylor, Jr. and Cheryl Taylor (“the Taylors”) in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 6:43 am by scanner1
CIVIL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT DA 15-0618, 2016 MT 184, PETER ARNONE, DAVE BALDWIN, ROSS HARTMAN, DAWNETTE OSEN, and SHARON SWANSON, Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:27 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Unlawful arrest — Dispute of material fact Ryan Brown was arrested in Baltimore City for possession of a handgun and related charges. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:15 am by Kenan Farrell
Mark Arruda et al Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00800-TWP-DKLFile Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2013Plaintiff: Richard N. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:31 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure — Motion to intervene This appeal arises out of foreclosure proceedings as to a property located at 9005 Forest Oaks Road in Owings Mills. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]