Search for: "Taylor v. U.s.*" Results 61 - 80 of 429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2019, 12:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 655 (6th Cir.2012) (explaining that the service requirement is satisfiedby proper service of process, consent, waiver, or forfeitureby the defendant (first citing Murphy Bros., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Frank Taylor, the former undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Richard Stengel, the former undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs; Matt Blaze, a professor of computer science and law at Georgetown University; and Ginny Badanes, the director for strategic projects in Microsoft's defending democracy program. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Taylor, the State Department’s Chargé d’Affaires Ad Interim in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
On Aug. 7, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in D.C. to force Don McGahn, former White House counsel, to comply with the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Fisher on Blackfeet Tribe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
Personnel note: the Russian troll’s lawyers are Dennis Edward Boyle and Blerina Jasari of Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP and Christopher Daniel Sullivan of Diamond McCarthy LLP. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
Two seminal events have occurred in recent days in the ongoing oversight war between the House of Representatives and the Trump administration—and in the ongoing expansion of the doctrine of executive privilege. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm by Caroline Lee
 This longstanding practice has been presumed lawful until recently,1 when the Sixth Circuit issued a misguided decision—Taylor v. [read post]