Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2025, 12:35 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2025.html United States, et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
Taylor , SLOAN SAKAI YEUNG & WONG LLP THIS ARTICLE ADDRESSES THE BROAD SCOPE OF artificial intelligence (AI) laws in the United States that focus on mitigating risk. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
… After the United States Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 7:42 am
In the longest running game of legal pong in years in the United States, the Supreme Court entered the fray in the battle over enforceability of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) requirements on disclosure of ownership with FinCEN. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 1:25 pm
United States, the justices will decide a procedural question relating to appeals. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:27 am
United States—in which Native Americans are challenging the federal government's plan to destroy a sacred site by turning it into a copper mine. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 1:33 pm
Note also that, although most protective order law is state law, this statute is from federal law, and so applies to a protective order issued anywhere in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 8:24 am
The Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 gun-rights ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm
Six years after Richards, the court in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 7:29 am
Taylor, which clarified the definition of a crime of violence for attempted Hobbs Act robbery.Crimes of Violence Under Federal Law On remand, the court revisited Armstrong’s convictions in light of United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am
Title 10 Chapter 15 also prohibits the provision of support to civilian law enforcement agencies “if the provision of such support will adversely affect the military preparedness of the United States” (10 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 8:33 am
United States, No. 23-402) didn't consider the Appointments Clause at all, so it would not be a good vehicle for a grant of certiorari. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
The Court held that the CFTC failed to demonstrate irreparable harm to itself or the public, a prerequisite for a stay.[2] The outcome of the appeal on the merits, with significant implications for the availability of election gambling contracts in the United States as well as the scope of the CFTC’s authority more broadly, greenlighted elections betting through the November presidential elections.[3] This week’s election results have seemingly confirmed… [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 3:31 am
While the ICWA has survived these legal challenges, including the recent 2023 Haaland v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
., to comply with caps on GHG emissions implemented by certain states). [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:08 am
In Goldwater v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505 [2004]; see also Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Serv [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505 [2004]; see also Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Serv [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:43 am
United States v. [read post]