Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:08 am
Taylor, 458 F.3d 1201, 1204 (11th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
”The President, with the State Budget Director's approval, then adopted a Regulation that reduced the State's contribution for health insurance premiums not only for employees in State’s several negotiating units that had agreed to the reductions through collective bargaining, but also for some “nonunionized employees” and retirees of the State as the employer. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:35 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Assn., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, County of Chautauqua Unit 6300, Chautauqua County Local 807, 8 NY3d 513[Matter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
Case date: 27 September 2021 Case number: No. 20-14374 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:21 pm
United States Department of the Interior (IGRA)Tule Lake Committee v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
United States, 559 U.S. 133 (2010)). [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
And in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1876); Tenet v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 2:06 am
See Gregg v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
* In Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn, 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Blackburne, 87 N.Y.2d 660, observed that a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration,. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
* In Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v Port Washington Teachers Assn, 268 AD2d 523, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Blackburne, 87 N.Y.2d 660, observed that a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration,. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:16 am
Lutz Superdyne, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In dictum, the Court of Appeal cited a recent SCOTUS case, Taylor v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]