Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2020, 7:55 am
United States, in which the IRS used a ‘John Doe’ summons that sought the identity of clients for whom the law firm had performed certain work. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
The trial court relied on United States v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 11:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am
The plaintiff had argued that his case is based on the defendant's contractual obligations, and the libel law cases thus don't apply: Plaintiff argues this case is controlled by the United States Supreme Court's holding in Cohen v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
That would be fitting, because if this fine book is ultimately about one thing, it surely would be debate itself—the deep and fundamental debate that roiled the early United States and transformed it into a new kind of constitutional republic. [read post]
2 May 2020, 8:39 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:05 pm
On May 1, 2020, in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
Davis – a challenge to the introduction of explicitly racially biased evidence in a Texas death penalty case – in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 6:54 pm
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947). [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
The Case Law Taylor Made Software Inc. v. [read post]
