Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,551
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies from holding state or federal office any person who has participated in an insurrection or rebellion against the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am
Dennis noted that the Supreme Court had only recently in Taylor v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Although the federal Hatch Act generally prohibits state and local employeesserving with state or local government entity whose principal employment is in connection with an activity which is financed in whole or in part by loans or grants made by the United States or a Federal agency, from being partisan candidates for elected office, Section 1502(a)(3) of the Act carves out a number of exceptions. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:26 am
What if the servers are not located in the United States but in another country? [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 5:00 pm
[1] Rockmore v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (emphasis added); see also Taylor Made Software, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
If we look into the past (and not even the very distant past), the law in the United States considered girls and women to be highly valuable living property. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 11:49 am
In elementary school, most children in the United States spend hours in grammar lessons learning the ins and outs of writing the English language. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
Circuit also held, in tandem with its first conclusion, that it “need not conclusively resolve whether and to what extent a court could second-guess the sitting President’s judgment that it is not in the interests of the United States to invoke privilege. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:14 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New Orleans in the matter United States v. [read post]
