Search for: "Teague v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
Under Teague v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
The question presented in Danforth is pretty simple: "Are state courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
The issue in the case is whether the so-called "Teague" formula (Teague v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
The second relevant case in Danforth is Teague v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In a recent article, Perry Moriearty argued that Miller was a substantive change to the law and thus qualifies for one of Teague v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
Under the Supreme Court's landmark 1989 decision in Teague v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Despite the apparent clarity of this “rule,” the Court’s decision in Teague v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
Rhoades v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:00 pm
The case is Figuereo-Sanchez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).See United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
A line of cases beginning with Teague v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 3:35 pm
" Teague, 489 U.S. at 301. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
Honestly, it's hard to see how Booker announced any "new right" at all (although many circuits have more or less said it did, for purposes of analyzing retroactivity under Teague v Lane, a related but not necessarily identical question, even in the cockamamie sense that the expression "new rule" is used for Teague v Lane purposes); what was *new* in Booker was the *remedy* not the "right" or the "rule," IMHO. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 9:50 pm
In the 1989 case, Teague v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
The fundamental spirit of Teague v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
En Teague v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm
On the retroactivity question, the Justices will be dealing with the continuing legal fall-out of a decision they issued in 1989, Teague v. [read post]
