Search for: "Tejinder Singh" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 8:47 am
" Tejinder Singh has this post at "SCOTUSblog. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:32 am by Brian Wolfman
For those of you who don't have a couple hours to spare, Tejinder Singh has edited down the audio from yesterday's Supreme Court argument on the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate to its essentials. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:55 pm by Legal Talk Network
Craig Williams and Bob Ambrogi discuss the latest Supreme Court decisions with Tony Mauro from the National Law Journal and Tejinder Singh from SCOTUSBlog. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:57 am by Katie Bart
Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell and John Duffy of the University of Virginia School of Law will talk about the argument and what the case may mean for trademarks in marketing and advertising. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
Yesterday's Calgary Herald reports that Justice Bryan Mahoney will now permit Tejinder Singh Sidhu to testify by video conference. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:24 am by Kali Borkoski
Tejinder Singh previewed the case for the blog. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by Kali Borkoski
  Tejinder Singh also provided our initial analysis of that decision. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:11 am by Kalvis Golde
Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell and John Duffy of the University of Virginia School of Law led a discussion for undergraduate students on how the case relates to trademarks in marketing and advertising. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm by Tejinder Singh
With the Court’s busiest month of the year now underway, Tejinder Singh takes a look back at this week at the Court. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:59 pm
The following analysis is by Tejinder Singh, a student at Harvard Law School and a summer associate at Akin Gump. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
  On 27 March 2012, Tejinder Singh made a criminal defamation complaint against Gen V K Singh for making the “libelous” statement in media about him. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Tejinder Singh, Sparacino PLLC; Sherally Munshi, Georgetown Law; and Sim J. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:02 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Tejinder Singh, also of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Perry. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:42 am
So the provision is unconstitutional under the challengers' interpretation, in Kennedy's view, he will have reason to agree with the government's interpretation (that is, he would follow the doctrine of constitutional avoidance).AND: SCOTUSblog has a second person, Tejinder Singh, also doing mid-argument reporting. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:40 am by admin
 Before the Supreme Court, Plaintiff was represented by Dan Schlanger, Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, and Professor Sam Bagenstos of University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am by Marissa Miller
 In addition, the firm is among the counsel to the respondent in Air Wisconsin, and Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell is among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 7:27 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Disclosures: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:40 am by admin
 Before the Supreme Court, Plaintiff was represented by Dan Schlanger, Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, and Professor Sam Bagenstos of University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
  Arguing for Edward Lane, Tejinder Singh suggested a narrow holding that essentially reasserted Garcetti v. [read post]