Search for: "Tenet v. Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2023, 4:31 pm
…The post Copyright does not protect content produced by Generative AI (GenAI): Thaler v Perlmutter appeared first on Barry Sookman. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 4:10 am
In Reinoehl v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:12 pm
The opinion in Tien v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In Cristello v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:53 am
See, for instance, Hamilton's famous argument in Rutgers v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 2:23 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:30 am
In Candice S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:47 pm
Abidadoud v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 12:51 pm
In Redlich v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:27 am
” [Thanks to V. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 4:05 am
Fourth, the rule revises regulations governing some discretionary grant programs under Titles III and V of the Higher Education Act.... [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:28 pm
I probably enjoy reading a ruling on a motion to compel a whole lot more than the judge does in writing it. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The comparative faith statement appeared on a slide under the heading “Peaceful Islam v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
Although the United States Constitution does not specifically guarantee voting secrecy, Anderson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
In any event, that something's a purported tenet of your religion does not necessarily mean that one actively practices it; for example, saying that all Catholics "abstain from premarital sex and don't use birth control" is fairly wildly inaccurate, at least in my experiences.It's not unusual to see a judge's worldview reflected in his or her opinions. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:00 am
So how does the absolute priority rule affect individual debtors? [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 6:57 pm
In Mayeux v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 7:31 pm
In Kirby v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's Regulation C 205," citing… [read post]
