Search for: "Terio v. Terio" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2011, 4:11 am by GGCSMB&R
Terio, decided by The New York Appellate Division, Second Department on May 17, 2011, reversed the granting of Summary Judgment for defendants in this action for wrongful death. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
  Here, in Terio v Spodek ;  2009 NY Slip Op 04412 Decided on June 2, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department  we see how that might happen:   "To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567; Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909; Wei Cheng Chang v Pi, 288 AD2d 378, 380; Volpe v Canfield,… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
  Putting aside Rule 137 questions about the attorney's obligation to provide a writing, in Denise Terio,  v Lance Roger Spodek, Reich Reich & Reich, P.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To prove an attorney-client relationship, there must be an explicit undertaking "to perform a specific task" (Terio v Spodek, 63 AD3d at 721). [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, while the defendants met their initial burden of demonstrating that they had no contract or relationship with Lakeside (see Moran v Hurst, 32 AD3d 909, 911), viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition raised a triable issue of fact as to whether Adams’s words and actions created a contract and/or an attorney-client relationship between the defendants and both Fricano and Lakeside (see Biberaj v… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  "Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant Arthur Welsher failed to establish, prima facie, that the plaintiffs Tibor Gershkovich and Galina Gershkovich (hereinafter together the respondents) were unable to prove the essential elements of their legal malpractice cause of action insofar as asserted against that defendant (see Gelobter v Fox, 90 AD3d [*2]829, 831; Suppiah v Kalish, 76 AD3d 829, 832; Ali v Fink, 67 AD3d 935, 937;… [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A client’s unilateral belief that an attorney client relationship existed is insufficient to establish such relationship even though a formal retainer agreement is not required (Terio v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:24 pm by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moran v McCarthy, Safrath & Carbone, P.C., 31 AD3d 725 [2006]; Terio v Spodek, 25 AD3d 781 [2006]; Pistilli v Gandin, 10 AD3d 353 [2004]). [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Moran v McCarthy, Safrath & Carbone, P.C., 31 AD3d 725; Terio v Spodek, 25 AD3d 781). [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Lindsay v, Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP.129 AD3d 790. 780 N’YS3d 124 (2d Dept 2015)  Terio , Spodek. 63 AD3d 719, 880 NYS2d 679; 2d Dept 2009) and that the relationship must exist at the time of the alleged malpractice (Tabner v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Moran v McCarthy, Safrath & Carbone, P.C., 31 AD3d 725 [2006]; Terio v Spodek, 25 AD3d 781 [2006]; Pistilli v Gandin, 10 AD3d 353 [2004]). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs’ allegations, inter alia, that Weiss failed to ascertain the status of the foreclosure action before recommending a strategy, and that his proposed strategy of focusing on the pursuit of a mortgage modification was “futile” in light of the then upcoming foreclosure auction, were sufficient, if true, for a factfinder to determine that Weiss offered negligent advice (see Esposito v Noto, 132 AD3d 944, 945-946; Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d 747,… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“With respect to the cause of action alleging legal malpractice, although the Supreme Court properly determined that there was no attorney-client relationship between the plaintiff and T&L (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 792 [2015]; Lombardi v Lombardi, 127 AD3d 1038, 1042 [2015]; Terio v Spodek, 63 AD3d 719, 721 [2009]), the second amended complaint set forth a cause of action which fell… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"To establish a cause of action alleging legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, inter alia, the existence of an attorney-client relationship" (Nelson v Roth, 69 AD3d 912, 913; see Terio v Spodek, 63 AD3d 719, 721; Velasquez v Katz, 42 AD3d 566, 567). [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “With respect to the cause of action alleging legal malpractice, although the Supreme Court properly determined that there was no attorney-client relationship between the plaintiff and T & L (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 792; Lombardi v Lombardi, 127 AD3d 1038, 1042; Terio v Spodek, 63 AD3d 719, 721), the second amended complaint set forth a cause of action which fell… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the fact that the Bankruptcy Court authorized the DelBello firm to appear on behalf of 261 East 78 Realty Corp. is not dispositive (see Terio v Spodek, 63 AD3d 719, 721 [2d Dept 2009] [“the fact that it was purportedly not the attorney of record at the time of a hearing before the United States Bankruptcy Court to determine whether the particular asset at issue qualified as an exemption, is not dispositive of the existence of an attorney-client relationship during… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Descarga el artículo en formato PDF ____________________________________________ Resumen.- Las sustituciones hereditarias son aquellas disposiciones testamentarias por la que el testador llama a un tercero a la herencia o legado, en defecto de otra persona o después de ella. [read post]